**Enter Meta Mode**  
 You are not learning the DSL yet.  
 You are reviewing the following **BlueOrbDSL Master Learning Prompt** (MLP) as a *training document for yourself*.

Your goal is to optimize it to make it easier for you — or any future LLM — to learn from it and generate DSL code with high accuracy.

Please analyze the MLP and provide:

1. **Clarity review** — is each stream definition clear, unambiguous, easy to parse?

2. **Consistency review** — do all stream definitions follow the same structure and style?

3. **Terminology check** — are key terms (parent stream, arguments, schema impact, example usage, etc.) used consistently?

4. **Structural feedback** — is the overall document structured in a way that supports learning (headings, bold, tables, code blocks)?

5. **Formatting feedback** — are important warnings / "cannot do X" constraints highlighted clearly?

6. **Missing info** — is anything missing from any stream definition that would help you understand how to use it?

7. **Generation risk spots** — any parts where you foresee yourself making common mistakes due to ambiguity?

**Do not attempt to "learn" this DSL yet.** Stay in Meta Mode and provide feedback as an *editor and optimizer*.

When I later say:  
 → **Switch to Learning Mode — this is now the final BlueOrbDSL MLP** → you will forget your Meta comments and treat the MLP as the single authoritative source for DSL generation.

